Muhammad
Faruq Bukhori
13020117140087
FILM AND LITERATURE ASSIGNMENT
NOVEL AND MOVIE: OLIVER TWSIT
It
said that both Film and Novel tell long stories with a wealth of detail and
they do it from the persepective of narrator, who often interposes a resonant
level of irony between the story and the observer. Film and novel are totally
different while novel tell people the story and film show people the story.
The images in the film have more direct
and immediate relationship to what it describes, while reading a novel requires
imagination. The film audiences could receive the information
from both images and sounds, while the novel readers only from the text.
In
this paper I would like to tell you about the major differences between oliver
twist novel and oliver twist movie. Oliver Twist novel was written by Charles
Dickens while Oliver Twist movie was Roman Polanski’s adaptation and this movie
released in 11th September 2005. The setting in book and movie is
about orphanage. Oliver Twist is The
novel’s protagonist. Oliver is an orphan born in a workhouse.
When I saw the movie, I was shocked
by the first plot of the movie, and it shown the story of chapter ii in Oliver
Twist Novel. In book the first chapter tells about the birth of Oliver while in
the first image of the movie shown Mr. Bumble bring oliver to the workhouse.
In
the chapter I of the novel it is said that Oliver was a parish boy, and his
mother name is Agnes Flemming. In movie of oliver twist that I saw, oliver’s
mother didn’t show up in the whole movie scene. In novel tells about his mom
who give birth while in movie didn’t show that at all. Oliver twist is
protagonist in both movie and book. The character of Oliver Twist have same
character in book and movie, he is small and weak young boy. When I saw the
movie in scene when oliver want to get more food in workhouse was the dramatic
scene same as when I read the novel “Please
Sir, I want some more”. That is the best line that come from book and movie.
On these scene I saw that Oliver forced by his friends in workhouse to ask some
more food, and it doesn’t same like what the book described. In the book it
said that Oliver dare to ask some more food not forced by his friends.
In
the movie it shows the London as the city where oliver twist started his
journey, when I saw the book and the movie, seems like London is a bad city to
living, there is to many thief and bad people out there. The same story when
oliver was from the countryside and he started to walk to London by foot but
when I saw the movie at the middle of the way oliver falling down and he get
rescued by the old lady, before that he get rejected at another house for
asking some food to eat.
There
is a lot character that I haven’t seen in the movie of Oliver Twist such as Mr.
Fang, Tom Chitling, Mr. Giles, Mr. Brittles, Monk, Mr. Lasberne, Agnes flemming
and many other. I don’t know why in Polanski’s adaptation those characters are
not there. Perhaps, about the duration of the movie, I think.
Back
into the movie and book, after Oliver arrived in London he get rest and he met
young gentleman. Then oliver talks to him, the young gentleman is artful doger.
Dodger bring oliver to his place, and in that place oliver met dodger’s friends
and fagin. The interesting scene in book that dickens describe fagin as the jew
and in the movie his religion is not mentioned. In the book dickens always
named fagin as “The Jew”.
Oliver
in fagin’s place he get trained how to pickpocketing with his new friends
there. In the other scene Oliver and dodger tries to steal sniffer from
mr.brownlow, but didn’t succeed because they get caught. On that time dodger
run away from that situation but oliver don’t and he get blamed for it.
In
the final scene is where bill sikes and nancy are killed. Bill is a
professional burglar brought up in fagin’s gang and he is nancy’s pimp and
lover. Nancy is killed by bill, bill kills nancy with his cane. In the movie
bill sikes dead because he hung himself.
The
book of Oliver twist by Charles dickens perhaps described social life in
England during victorian era. The film was so good to watch I can say this
movie not really same like what book tells many differences that I found such
as lack of the character in movie.
Comments
Post a Comment